Deep Brain Stimulation and Ethics: Perspectives from a Multisite Qualitative Study of Canadian Neurosurgical Centers
Objective
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved neurosurgical intervention for motor disorders such as Parkinson disease. The emergence of psychiatric uses for DBS combined with the fact that it is an invasive and expensive procedure creates important ethical and social challenges in the delivery of care that need further examination. We endeavored to examine health care provider perspectives on ethical and social challenges encountered in DBS.
Methods
Health care providers working in Canadian DBS surgery programs participated in a semistructured interview to identify and characterize ethical and social challenges of DBS. A content analysis of the interviews was conducted.
Results
Several key ethical issues, such as patient screening and resource allocation, were identified by members of neurosurgical teams. Providers described challenges in selecting patients for DBS on the basis of unclear evidence-based guidance regarding behavioral issues or cognitive criteria. Varied contexts of resource allocation, including some very challenging schemas, were also reported. In addition, the management of patients in the community was highlighted as a source of ethical and clinical complexity, given the need for coordinated long-term care.
Conclusions
This study provides insights into the complexity of ethical challenges that providers face in the use of DBS across different neurosurgical centers. We propose actions for health care providers for the long-term care and postoperative monitoring of patients with DBS. More data on patient perspectives in DBS would complement the understanding of key challenges, as well as contribute to best practices, for patient selection, management, and resource allocation.
Key words: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) , Ethics , Parkinson disease , Patient selection , Resource allocation
Abbreviations and Acronyms: DBS, Deep brain stimulation, ICD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NNF 80045; States of Mind: Emerging Issues in Neuroethics (ER); New Investigator Award (ER); and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (EB).
PII: S1878-8750(11)00617-6
doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.033
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
