World Neurosurgery
Volume 76, Issue 6 , Pages 537-547, December 2011

Deep Brain Stimulation and Ethics: Perspectives from a Multisite Qualitative Study of Canadian Neurosurgical Centers

  • Emily Bell

      Affiliations

    • Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Bruce Maxwell

      Affiliations

    • Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Mary Pat McAndrews

      Affiliations

    • Division of Brain Imaging & Behaviour Systems–Neuroscience, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Abbas Sadikot

      Affiliations

    • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • ,
  • Eric Racine

      Affiliations

    • Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
    • Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
    • Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medicine, and Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationTo whom correspondence should be addressed: Eric Racine, Ph.D.

Received 13 October 2010; accepted 13 May 2011.

Objective

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved neurosurgical intervention for motor disorders such as Parkinson disease. The emergence of psychiatric uses for DBS combined with the fact that it is an invasive and expensive procedure creates important ethical and social challenges in the delivery of care that need further examination. We endeavored to examine health care provider perspectives on ethical and social challenges encountered in DBS.

Methods

Health care providers working in Canadian DBS surgery programs participated in a semistructured interview to identify and characterize ethical and social challenges of DBS. A content analysis of the interviews was conducted.

Results

Several key ethical issues, such as patient screening and resource allocation, were identified by members of neurosurgical teams. Providers described challenges in selecting patients for DBS on the basis of unclear evidence-based guidance regarding behavioral issues or cognitive criteria. Varied contexts of resource allocation, including some very challenging schemas, were also reported. In addition, the management of patients in the community was highlighted as a source of ethical and clinical complexity, given the need for coordinated long-term care.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into the complexity of ethical challenges that providers face in the use of DBS across different neurosurgical centers. We propose actions for health care providers for the long-term care and postoperative monitoring of patients with DBS. More data on patient perspectives in DBS would complement the understanding of key challenges, as well as contribute to best practices, for patient selection, management, and resource allocation.

Key words:  Deep brain stimulation (DBS) , Ethics , Parkinson disease , Patient selection , Resource allocation

Abbreviations and Acronyms:  DBS, Deep brain stimulation, ICD, Implantable cardioverter defibrillators

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, NNF 80045; States of Mind: Emerging Issues in Neuroethics (ER); New Investigator Award (ER); and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (EB).

PII: S1878-8750(11)00617-6

doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.033

World Neurosurgery
Volume 76, Issue 6 , Pages 537-547, December 2011