Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution Is Safe in Neurosurgery
Objective
To determine the safety of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.
Methods
A group of 100 patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures was assigned prospectively to receive ANH. A group of 47 patients who underwent craniotomy for aneurysm clipping and standard anesthetic management was used as a control. Procedures conducted under ANH were performed without significant variations in physiologic parameters.
Results
Compared with controls, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, incidence and grade of complications, and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups. Although the ANH group showed a difference in prothrombin levels before and after hemodilution procedures, the levels were still considered within physiologic parameters. Platelet counts and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) levels indicated no significant variations in either group. During the ANH procedure, a considerable reduction of brain oxygen extraction was observed in individuals with worse preoperative neurologic status (P < 0.05), indicating potential benefit. Among patients with cerebral aneurysm, patients with good initial clinical grades had better clinical results as indicated by Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (P < 0.02).
Conclusions
ANH is a safe procedure for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Further studies are necessary to confirm the improvement in brain oxygen extraction and the clinical impact. Nonetheless, patients undergoing aneurysm clipping with good clinical grades seem to profit from ANH.
Key words: Autologous blood , Hemodilution , Neurosurgery , Red blood cell transfusion
Abbreviations and Acronyms: ANH, Acute normovolemic hemodilution, PTT, Partial thromboplastin time, SAH, Subarachnoid hemorrhage
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
PII: S1878-8750(12)00206-9
doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.041
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
