Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 84, Issue 2, August 2015, Pages 405-411
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Radiographic Detectability of Retained Neuropatties in a Cadaver Model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.032Get rights and content

Background

Counts are the commonest method used to ensure that all sponges and neuropatties are removed from a surgical site before closure. When the count is not reconciled, plain radiographs of the operative site are taken to determine whether the missing patty has been left in the wound. The purpose of this study was to describe the detectability of commonly used neuropatties in the clinical setting using digital technologies.

Methods

Neuropatties were implanted into the anterior and posterior cranial fossae and the thoracolumbar extradural space of a mature male cadaver. Four neuropatty sizes were used: 3 × 1 in, 2 × ½ in, ½ × ½ in, and ¼ × ¼ in. Neuropatties, with size and location chosen at random, were placed in the surgical sites and anteroposterior/posterior-anterior and lateral radiographs were taken using standard portable digital radiographic equipment. Six clinicians reviewed the digital images for the presence or absence of neuropatties. The readers were not aware of the number and size of the patties that were included in each image.

Results

The detectability of neuropatties is dependent on the size of the neuropatty's radiopaque marker and the operative site. Neuropatties measuring 2 × ½ in and 3 × 1 in were detected reliably regardless of the operative site. ¼ × ¼ in neuropatties were poorly detected by neurosurgeons and radiologists in all three operative sites. Readers of various experience and background were similar in their ability to detect neuropatties under these conditions.

Conclusions

Under simulated operating room conditions and using currently available neuropatties and plain radiograph imaging technology, small ¼-in and ½-in neuropatties are poorly visible/detectable on digital images.

Introduction

An unintentionally retained foreign body is a potential risk of any invasive procedure. Surgical sponges are the most common type of unintentionally retained foreign bodies (26). Retained surgical sponges (RSS) are chemically inert but induce an inflammatory response in situ. Patients may develop an acute exudative reaction or chronic fibroblastic encapsulation (23). Complications vary depending on the RSS location (13). Serious complications include formation of an abscess or fistula, perforation of a viscus, sepsis, and mortality 6, 18, 20, 26. The median time to discovery is 2.2 years (26), but RSS may remain undetected for ≥40 years 7, 25, 28.

RSS are theoretically preventable and are classified by the National Quality Forum and the Joint Commission as “never events.” In some jurisdictions, hospitals are financially penalized for never events (17). In malpractice suits, RSS are deemed indefensible. Documentation of correct surgical counts and adherence to standards of care does not indemnify the responsible surgeon or the team (12). The legal and compensation costs per RSS incident vary greatly, ranging from $37,000 to $2.3 million (8).

In neurosurgery, neuropatties are the commonest surgical sponges that pose a risk for RSS. When the final count does not agree with the “on-table count,” current standards require that plain radiographs of the operative site be taken before/after wound closure to exclude the possibility of a RSS. Commonly, RSS occur in patients in whom the counts were “correct” 4, 6.

Despite meeting industry testing standards for radiopacity, surgical sponges are not easily detected on plain films in clinical situations (23). The detectability of surgical sponges has been assessed using analogue plain film imaging, 5, 15, 22, 24, 27, but the detectability thresholds of neuropatties using digital imaging technology under clinical conditions is unknown.

The present study assessed the detectability of currently available neuropatties implanted in common neurosurgical sites in an adult cadaver model, using clinical radiographic digital imaging techniques and clinician readers.

Section snippets

Preparation of Operative Sites Model

A cadaver was obtained from the Body Donation Program in the Faculty of Medicine at University of British Columbia. The specimen was a mature man in whom the cause of death was unknown. There was no evidence of surgery involving the head or spine. An ileostomy was noted on the abdomen. At the time of dissection, the brain had undergone some autolysis. There was no radiographic evidence of implanted foreign body or of pathologic soft tissue calcification.

Three surgical sites were chosen: the

Interpretive Reliability

The interobserver consistency was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient. There was strong agreement between the 6 readers despite differences in training and experience (Table 2).

Overall Sensitivity and Specificity

Despite minor variability between individual responses, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) from every sensitivity analysis performed on aggregated data from the first and second readings overlapped. Reader performance with isolated projections in the first sitting was identical to performance on paired

Discussion

The true incidence of RSS is unknown but is estimated to be between 1 in 5500 and 1 in 18,760 surgeries (8). Past studies have used malpractice claims as a surrogate data source, which likely underestimate incidence due to undetected asymptomatic patients, unreported near-misses, and patients who do not pursue a malpractice claim. Even with the proliferation of centralized, mandatory reporting systems, detection of RSS occurrences remains a challenge.

There are case-related risk factors for RSS

Conclusion

In summary, under simulated operating room conditions and using currently available neuropatties and plain radiograph imaging technology, ½ × ½ in or smaller neuropatties are not reliably detected on digital radiographs. If the institutional protocol includes intraoperative imaging when the neurosurgical sponge count cannot be resolved or for high risk situations, tomographic imaging should be considered to rule out a retained neuropatty if intraoperative radiographs are negative.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yogesh Thakur, medical physicist, and his team for their expertise in validating clinical parameters for imaging the anterior and posterior cranial fossae. The recommended parameters were derived from signal-to-noise calculations on radiographs of neuropatties affixed to a phantom head model and parameters were qualitatively verified in the cadaver model. We also thank our colleagues who participated as readers in this study.

References (28)

  • C.T. Hsieh et al.

    Textiloma as a complication of transsphenoidal surgery

    Neurosciences (Riyadh)

    (2011)
  • J.W. Hyslop et al.

    Natural history of the retained surgical sponge

    South Med J

    (1982)
  • International A: ASTM F640-79(2000) Standard Test Methods for Radiopacity of Plastics for Medical Use

    (2000)
  • C.W. Kaiser et al.

    The retained surgical sponge

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • Cited by (2)

    • Retention of Nonabsorbable Hemostatic Materials (Retained Surgical Sponge, Gossypiboma, Textiloma, Gauzoma, Muslinoma) After Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported During the Last Half-Century

      2018, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      CT imaging may be useful for detecting retained small materials in cases of RNHMs. Recently, Luo et al.61 revealed that X-ray examination did not demonstrate small surgical sponges in a cadaveric study, suggesting the importance of an accurate sponge counting and careful tracking of sponges during the surgery. On CT study, foreign body granulomas appear as well-circumscribed masses with hyperdense materials and demonstrate capsular enhancement at the surgical site.1,62,63

    Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    View full text