Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 96, December 2016, Pages 16-22
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Evaluation of Metallic Artifacts Caused by Nonpenetrating Titanium Clips in Postoperative Neuroimaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.086Get rights and content

Background

Nonpenetrating titanium clips create no suture holes and thereby reduce cerebrospinal fluid leakage after dural closure. However, no data exist regarding metallic artifacts caused by these clips during postoperative neuroimaging. We aimed to evaluate clip-related artifacts on postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images of 17 patients who underwent spinal surgery.

Methods

A phantom study evaluated the size of metallic artifacts, and a clinical study evaluated the quality of postoperative spinal MR images. Both 1.5-T studies used T1-weighted and T2-weighted fast spin echo sequences. The phantom study compared clip and artifact size for 10 clips. Artifacts were defined as signal voids surrounded by high signal amplitude that followed the clip shape. In the clinical study, 2 neurosurgeons assessed 22 images from 17 patients of the spinal cord, cauda equina, and paravertebral muscles adjacent to the nonpenetrating titanium clips, using 5-point scales.

Results

Mean metallic artifact sizes were 4.82 ± 0.16 mm (T1) and 4.66 ± 0.25 mm (T2; P < 0.001 vs. control). The former and latter were respectively 207% and 200% larger than the clip size. Both readers graded spinal cord and paravertebral muscles images as 3 or 4, indicating very good image quality regardless of clip-related artifacts, with excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.99 and 0.98, respectively).

Conclusions

Metallic artifacts caused by nonpenetrating titanium clips were 200% larger than the actual clip but did not affect spinal cord and extradural tissue visualization. The use of these clips for closing the spinal dura mater does not alter postoperative radiologic evaluation quality.

Introduction

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication of spinal surgery, and its prevention is crucial, particularly after surgery for spinal intradural lesions. Several sealing materials have been proposed as adjuncts for dural closure to minimize the potential for adverse events, such as infection, and to decrease the risk of pseudomeningocele formation. However, CSF leakage is not always prevented during these procedures. Compared with the intracranial region, the spinal region offers a narrower operative field and a thinner and more fragile dura mater1, 2; therefore, meticulous dural suturing may be impossible after intradural procedures.

The nonpenetrating titanium clip has been designed to achieve faultless vascular anastomoses. This clip does not create any suture holes and has been successfully used in peripheral arterial bypass surgery.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Its use was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for vascular anastomosis and reconstruction in December 1993 and for dural closure in 1996 (Figure 1).

We have previously reported the usefulness of nonpenetrating titanium clips for dural closure in spinal surgery on the basis of data from both in vitro and clinical studies.1 A significant difference was apparent between expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) sutures and nonpenetrating titanium clips in terms of the water pressure that could be tolerated by sutured ePTFE sheets, with the latter tolerating 1508% greater leakage pressure than the former. Moreover, these clips do not close completely (Figure 1) and therefore make no suture holes. Regarding CSF leakage patterns, the nonpenetrating titanium clips did not make any suture holes in the ePTFE sheet and fluid leakage occurred between the clips, whereas fluid leakage was associated with the pressure increase that occurred at the suture holes made by the ePTFE sutures. Of 31 patients who underwent spinal intradural procedures using nonpenetrating titanium clips, 1 (3.2%) experienced CSF leakage postoperatively. No other complications (eg, allergic reactions, adhesions, or infections) were encountered.

On the other hand, because these clips are made of titanium alloy, they may cause mechanical artifacts on postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images. This situation may complicate follow-up, particularly in cases of intradural tumorous lesions. Animal studies have shown significantly less inflammation, a lesser extent of foreign body reactions, and fewer meningoneural adhesions with the use of nonpenetrating titanium clips compared with the use of penetrating needles and sutures for dural plasty.9

However, no experimental and clinical studies have evaluated metallic artifacts caused by nonpenetrating titanium clips in postoperative neuroimaging. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the mechanical artifacts associated with nonpenetrating titanium clips on postoperative MR images using a simple model that mimicked spinal surgery. In addition, we present our surgical experience with these clips in 17 consecutive patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study evaluating such artifacts.

Section snippets

Nonpenetrating Titanium Clips

Nonpenetrating titanium clips (VCS [Vascular Closure System] [LeMaitre Vascular Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts, USA]) are manufactured for the reconstruction of tubular organs, including peripheral arteries and veins. The technical and biological advantages of nonpenetrating titanium clips have been described previously.3, 4, 5, 6, 8 Scanning electron microscopy showed incomplete closure of the tips; consequently, no suture holes were created (Figure 1). We measured 10 nonpenetrating titanium

Metallic Artifact Size Measurements

The mean metallic artifact sizes were 4.82 ± 0.16 mm and 4.66 ± 0.25 mm on T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, respectively; both values were significantly different from the measured size (control; P < 0.001 for both), with the former value being 207% larger and the latter being 200% larger than that of the control size (Figure 4).

Quality of Postoperative Spinal MR Images

Table 2 shows the image quality scores for the spinal cord and paravertebral muscles on T1-weighted and T2-weighted fast-spin echo sequences. Both readers graded

Discussion

In the present study, we evaluated the mechanical artifacts associated with nonpenetrating titanium clips on postoperative MR images using a simple model that mimicked spinal surgery and reported our surgical experience with these clips in 17 consecutive patients. Although use of these clips has advantages over the use of penetrating needles and sutures, the metallic artifacts caused by these clips on postoperative MR images were a major concern. Devices that cause severe mechanical artifacts

Conclusions

We showed that the size of metallic artifacts caused by nonpenetrating titanium clips on MR images was almost 200% larger than the actual size of the clips. Nevertheless, visualization of the spinal cord and surrounding extradural tissues was excellent, regardless of the presence of artifacts associated with these clips. These findings suggest that the use of nonpenetrating titanium clips for spinal dura mater closure does not alter the quality of postoperative radiologic evaluations.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor H. Takyu and Mr. T. Mimura at the Center for Clinical Research, Shinshu University Hospital; Mr. T. Furui at the Division of Radiology, Seguchi Neurosurgical Hospital; and Mr. Y. Kitoh at the Division of Radiology, Shinshu University Hospital for their technical support.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • Novel use of nonpenetrating titanium clips for pediatric primary spinal dural closure: A technical note

    2022, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to their titanium nature, the clips can cause a small amount of metal artifact to occur in postoperative magnetic resonance images, which may obfuscate detailed follow-up [18]. Given that many indications of tethered cord release are due to traction caused primary pathologic lesions, [9] such as dural lipomas, precise radiologic discrimination is often necessary in this cohort. Our experience in follow-up yielded a manageable level of imaging artifact, which is similar to the postoperative radiologic evaluation study by Jang et al. and Ito et al. [18,19] In particular, despite an artifact size 200 % larger than the actual clip size, Ito et al. report that visualization of the spinal cord and surrounding extradural tissue "was excellent" [19]. The cost of these clips is undeniably higher when compared to traditional suture, however, there is evidence in the vascular anastamotic closure literature to suggest that clips may be more cost-effective when considering improvements in operating time and adverse events [20,21].

  • Effectiveness of Repair Techniques for Spinal Dural Tears: A Systematic Review

    2021, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    These clips may come with the advantages of reduced CSF leakage, dural exposure, scarring, and intradural adhesions, as well as improved efficiency and ease of application as compared with traditional suturing.29,37 Although a concern with titanium clips has been the risk of causing metallic artifacts during postoperative imaging,37 several studies have suggested that the clips are small enough that they do not have significant impact on the quality of postoperative imaging.29,37,48,49 Nonetheless, several disadvantages associated with nonpenetrating clips have been reported: dural laceration, dislodgement, the inability to reposition or reuse clips once they have left the applier, greater cost, and even a high rate of CSF leaks as reported by Timothy et al49 in 2007.

  • Repair of a spinal pseudomeningocele in a delayed postsurgical cerebrospinal fluid leak using titanium U-clips: Technical note

    2020, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Radiological follow-up is not compromised by titanium clips that are MRI compatible and do not cause significant artifacts [29]. The utility of non-penetrating titanium U-clips for dural closure has been previously described but only in non-accidental durotomy and it is effective, simple reducing the impact of the surgeon’s skills as a risk factor for CSF leakage [12,30,31]. The authors presented a technical report in which U-clips are used to manage an insidious case of CCFL.

  • Spinal dural closure without suture: Minimizing the risk of CSF leakage with a flat non-penetrating titanium U-clip

    2019, Neurocirugia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The U-clips produce a small artefact in the post-operative images. The quality of the radiological evaluation was not altered by the use of the U-clip.19 The applicator and the U-clip were not designed for spinal dural closure.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest statement: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) provided financial support in the form of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research: KAKENHI. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. 15 K10356.

View full text