Letter to the EditorRisk Factors for Poor Outcome in Hypertensive Intraventricular Hemorrhage Treated by External Ventricular Drainage with Intraventricular Fibrinolysis: Statistical and Methodologic Issues
References (4)
- et al.
Risk factors for poor outcome in hypertensive intraventricular hemorrhage treated by external ventricular drainage with intraventricular fibrinolysis
World Neurosurg
(2017) Statistics for Epidemiology
(2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (6)
Exploration of Efficacy and Safety of Interventions for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis
2020, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, with the aging population and the increasing use of anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs, the morbidity of patients is also increasing.30,31 The treatment of these diseases has developed with the continuing exploration of neurosurgeons and neurologists in the past few decades, but treatment efficacy is still limited.32,33 EVD is the standard treatment in patients with IVH; however, the high catheter obstruction rates, frequent catheter replacements, and longer drainage time can limit its efficacy.34,35
Microsurgical treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia vis translateral fissure-insula approach assisted by traction-free technique
2019, Chinese Journal of Clinical ResearchExternal ventricular drainage combined with continuous lumbar drainage in the treatment of ventricular hemorrhage
2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.