Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 105, September 2017, Pages 412-419
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Comparison of Operative Time with Conventional Fluoroscopy Versus Spinal Neuronavigation in Instrumented Spinal Tumor Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.016Get rights and content

Objective

Spinal neuronavigation improves accuracy of pedicle screw placement but may increase operative time, and its use in oncologic operations remains relatively unstudied. We compared the use of two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy and three-dimensional (3D) spinal neuronavigation relative to operative time in instrumented oncology procedures.

Methods

Consecutive instrumented oncologic spinal operations for multiple myeloma or metastatic disease performed between 2012 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were placed in 2 groups based on the method used for pedicle screw placement: 2D fluoroscopy versus spinal neuronavigation with 3D imaging. These groups were compared by age, number of screws placed, number of laminectomy levels, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay after surgery, and rate of reoperation as a result of screw misplacement.

Results

Fourteen operations used 2D fluoroscopy and 25 used spinal neuronavigation. In the fluoroscopy and neuronavigation groups, respectively, patient ages were 64.71 ± 7.21 years and 63.24 ± 6.95 years (P = 0.534), number of screws was 8.07 ± 1.98 and 7.84 ± 1.34 (P = 0.667), laminectomy levels were 2.18 ± 1.25 and 1.60 ± 1.02 (P = 0.126), operative time was 200.79 ± 34.99 minutes and 193.48 ± 43.77 minutes (P = 0.596), estimated blood loss was 790.00 ± 769.61 mL and 389.80 ± 551.43 mL (P = 0.068), and length of stay after the operation was 7.64 ± 4.63 days and 6.40 ± 3.23 days (P = 0.331). One patient in the 2D fluoroscopy group and no patients in the spinal neuronavigation group required a reoperation for screw misplacement.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in length of operative time when neuronavigation was compared with fluoroscopy for instrumented oncologic spinal surgery. There was a trend toward a decrease in estimated blood loss in the neuronavigation cases.

Introduction

Spinal metastases occur in approximately 30% of patients with cancer.1, 2, 3 Primary sites such as the breast and the prostate have even higher rates of spinal metastases.4 Surgical management is an integral part of the care for patients with spinal metastatic disease.5 Operative decompression before radiotherapy in patients with myelopathy results in improved ambulation, decreased need for opioids, and prolonged survival.6 Further, instrumented spinal stabilization in patients with spinal metastatic disease results in improved neurologic outcomes, including a higher chance of recovery of ambulation after presentation with paraplegia.7, 8 Recent studies also support separation surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for epidural decompression, stabilization, and disease control without requiring extensive vertebral body resection.9, 10

Multiple myeloma accounts for 10% of all hematologic malignancies and frequently results in osteolytic bone disease, with the spine being the most commonly affected site.11, 12 Vertebral body destruction as part of the multiple myeloma disease process can lead to pain, spinal deformity, and neural element compression.13 Surgical management of multiple myeloma-related vertebral column disease includes kyphoplasty for pathologic vertebral compression fractures, with resection and instrumentation recommended for cases of instability.14, 15, 16

Misplacement of pedicle screws during spinal stabilization surgery can result in an injury to an adjacent nerve root or the spinal cord itself, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and hemorrhage.17, 18, 19, 20 Freehand pedicle screw placement is based on anatomic landmarks and is subject to a learning curve; misplacement rates, as defined by perforation of the pedicle, vary with technique and have been reported as high as 55%.17, 18, 21, 22, 23 Fluoroscopic guidance is a common surgical tool for the placement of spinal instrumentation. Intraoperative two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy, three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy, and computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation allow for greater accuracy than does conventional fluoroscopy.21, 24 The reported screw misplacement rates using spinal neuronavigation are lower than with freehand placement or use of traditional fluoroscopy.17, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30

Both advantages and disadvantages have been reported for the use of spinal neuronavigation. Radiation exposure to the surgical team has been found to be decreased with 3D neuronavigation compared with traditional fluoroscopy.17 Radiation exposure to the patient also is likely decreased, especially when guidance and confirmatory imaging are obtained intraoperatively, thereby eliminating preoperative and postoperative imaging. Still, some studies have found increased radiation exposure in patients with 3D navigation.17, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 A major reason that surgeons have given for not implementing neuronavigation in spine surgery is concern regarding an increase in operative time.39 Studies addressing this concern are mixed, because some centers report a longer operative time with 3D spinal navigation and others report an insignificant operative time difference.37, 40, 41, 42

There is limited literature regarding the use of 3D neuronavigation in spinal tumor surgery, and there is no report on conventional fluoroscopy versus spinal neuronavigation operative time comparisons for this cohort of patients. Spinal oncology surgery is more likely to be performed in the thoracic spine with smaller pedicles and feature longer constructs incorporating more pedicle screws than do degenerative spinal operations. Thus, any spinal neuronavigation effect on operative time has the potential to be more pronounced in this surgical group. Because of the medical complexities and increased comorbidities of patients with metastatic disease to the spine,43 any increase in operative time and thus anesthesia time could be detrimental. Further, increased operative time could result in increased blood loss during an oncologic procedure. The purpose of our study was to examine and compare operative time in a cohort of consecutive patients requiring laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for spinal column tumors (metastatic disease or multiple myeloma) before and after the integration of 3D-based spinal neuronavigation at our institution.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was approved by our institutional review board. Consecutive spinal operations performed by a single neurosurgeon (A.J.F.) between 2012 and 2014 were retrospectively identified with data collected and managed using the REDCap system (Research Electronic Data Capture, licensed by Vanderbilt University Medical Center). Patients undergoing oncologic instrumented spinal surgery were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had a primary diagnosis other than metastasis from a

Results

A total of 52 consecutive spinal operations performed between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed. Five patients underwent surgery for diagnoses other than metastatic disease or multiple myeloma and were therefore excluded. An additional 2 patients were excluded because they had previously undergone surgery at the same level. Of the remaining 45 cases, 6 procedures did not require instrumentation and were excluded. This process resulted in inclusion of 39 operative cases. Of these cases, 14 were

Discussion

This study was carried out to compare the operative times of patients requiring laminectomy and posterior instrumentation using 2D fluoroscopy and 3D spinal neuronavigation for spinal tumor surgery. No significant difference in the length of the operation was found between the 2 groups in our cohort. The patients in each group were of similar age, required a similar number of pedicle screws placed for stabilization, and required laminectomies at a similar number of levels, with there being no

Conclusions

The use of spinal neuronavigation during posterior instrumentation can provide a benefit for oncologic patients requiring this procedure. The potential drawback of increased operative time and increased time under anesthesia is not supported by our results, because the operative time with neuronavigation did not significantly differ from the operative time before its implementation at our center. Further, our results suggest that using spinal neuronavigation in oncologic spinal instrumentation

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paul H. Dressel, B.F.A., for preparation of the illustrations and Carrie Owens, M.S.I.L.S., and Elaine C. Mosher, M.L.S., for editorial assistance. Conception and design, both authors; acquisition of data, both authors; analysis and interpretation of data, both authors; drafting the manuscript, J.A.M.; critically revising the manuscript, both authors; reviewed final version of the manuscript and approved it for submission, both authors.

References (60)

  • A. Seicean et al.

    The effect of blood transfusion on short-term, perioperative outcomes in elective spine surgery

    J Clin Neurosci

    (2014)
  • S.J. Janssen et al.

    Allogeneic blood transfusions and postoperative infections after lumbar spine surgery

    Spine J

    (2015)
  • S. Kato et al.

    Risk of infectious complications associated with blood transfusion in elective spinal surgery-a propensity score matched analysis

    Spine J

    (2016)
  • G. Disibio et al.

    Metastatic patterns of cancers: results from a large autopsy study

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2008)
  • J.A. Ortiz Gomez

    The incidence of vertebral body metastases

    Int Orthop

    (1995)
  • D.A. Wong et al.

    Spinal metastases: the obvious, the occult, and the impostors

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1990)
  • G.R. Mundy

    Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2002)
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network

    Central Nervous System Cancers (Version 1.2015)

  • J.M. Kim et al.

    Clinical outcome of metastatic spinal cord compression treated with surgical excision +/- radiation versus radiation therapy alone: a systematic review of literature

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2012)
  • E.W. Akeyson et al.

    Single-stage posterior vertebrectomy and replacement combined with posterior instrumentation for spinal metastasis

    J Neurosurg

    (1996)
  • I. Laufer et al.

    Local disease control for spinal metastases following “separation surgery” and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2013)
  • B.G. Bate et al.

    Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases with or without separation surgery

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2015)
  • R.E. Walker et al.

    Myeloma bone disease: pathogenesis, current treatments and future targets

    Br Med Bull

    (2014)
  • M.A. Hussein

    Multiple myeloma: most common end-organ damage and management

    J Natl Compr Canc Netw

    (2007)
  • A. Julka et al.

    Functional outcomes and height restoration for patients with multiple myeloma-related osteolytic vertebral compression fractures treated with kyphoplasty

    J Spinal Disord Tech

    (2014)
  • P.L. Zadnik et al.

    Outcomes following surgical intervention for impending and gross instability caused by multiple myeloma in the spinal column

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2015)
  • J. Qian et al.

    Partial tumor resection combined with chemotherapy for multiple myeloma spinal cord compression

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2014)
  • Z.B. Moses et al.

    Neuronavigation in minimally invasive spine surgery

    Neurosurg Focus

    (2013)
  • T. Tjardes et al.

    Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions

    Eur Spine J

    (2010)
  • S.I. Esses et al.

    Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1993)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Perioperative Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopically Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

      2021, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Postoperative complications were also similar between the 2 groups. Previous studies reported decreased rates of revision surgery for RA TLIF owing to the improved screw placement accuracy and reduction of human error using the robotic system.9,27-29 In our study, we did not observe significant differences in terms of the rates of revision between the RA and FG cohorts.

    • Initiation of a Robotic Program in Spinal Surgery: Experience at a Three-Site Medical Center

      2021, Mayo Clinic Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      Overall, robot-guided procedures have been associated with a reduced rate of postoperative revisions. Supporting this conclusion drawn from the literature, our preliminary experience did not have any postoperative revisions.21,22 Although it is important to assess major outcomes such as accuracy of screw placement or intraoperative and postoperative screw revisions, a health economics perspective should also be considered with a new technology to understand its value in health care.

    • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Parameters in Robot-Guided, Navigated, and Freehand Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Only 1 study included all 3 arms. Of the 31 studies included, we identified 8 RCTs (26%),23-30 3 prospective controlled studies (10%),31-33 and 20 retrospective matched or controlled cohort studies (65%).9,34-53 However, most studies had deficiencies in their methodology or reporting according to the GRADE protocol, resulting in a lower-quality rating.

    • Pedicle Screw Revision in Robot-Guided, Navigated, and Freehand Thoracolumbar Instrumentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      2018, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of the 37 included studies, only 9 were RCTs and 14 were prospective studies, overall.31,33,37,40,42,43,45,47,49,52,55,56,58,60 The remaining 23 were retrospective controlled or matched cohort studies.25-30,32,34-36,38,39,41,44,46,48,50,51,53,54,57,59,61 According to the GRADE protocol, most studies had methodological flaws, resulting in a downgraded quality rating.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    View full text