Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 109, January 2018, Pages 338-341
World Neurosurgery

Historical Vignette
Paul of Aegina (625–690): His Work and His Contribution to Neurologic Surgery: Trephinations and Laminectomies in the Dark Ages

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.047Get rights and content

The purpose of this historical review is to summarize the work of Paul of Aegina, especially his contribution to the treatment of neurosurgical disorders and trauma. Paul performed trephinations for head injuries in the tradition of the Egyptian and the Greek schools of medicine. However, he was an innovator in the treatment of several spine injuries, as his choice to perform laminectomies and his description of them as safe and successful is unprecedented in the history of the recorded medicine and surgery. Our search of the literature shows that Paul was the first to include in his practice such a surgical technique, and, in this way, he is an innovator, since Hippocrates described the results of spine surgery as disastrous for the patient. Thus, he may be considered the historic father of spine surgery for his pioneering surgical innovations. This shows clearly that innovation in science and medicine was significantly increased through the rise of Islam and the Arabic conquest of the Middle East. The so-called “Dark Ages” were not so dark after all.

Introduction

The purpose of this historical review is to summarize the work of Paul of Aegina (625–690) (Figure 1), especially his contribution to the treatment of neurosurgical disorders and trauma. A major review of the available literature in PubMed and Google Scholar and additionally of books and library material was undertaken. An effort was made to find the most significant parts of his contribution to surgery and medicine, with a special interest in neurologic surgery for both brain and spine diseases.

Therefore, this review focuses on the role of Paul of Aegina in the history of surgery and his influence in the subsequent medicine and surgery of the Islam, proving that he was not only a carrier of the knowledge discovered by his predecessors (Hippocrates, Galen, etc.) but that he expanded the horizons of surgery of his time, using his talent to perform very complicated surgery with favorite outcomes in a variety of diseases in many fields of medicine. This review will focus especially in the use of laminectomy and trepanation in his practice, his methods, and the conditions in which he applied such treatment options.

Section snippets

Paul's Early Life and Studies

Paul was born on the island of Aegina in the Saronic Gulf, just outside Athens. Little is known of his early life. He studied medicine in Alexandria, Egypt. There, he acquired a deep knowledge of Greek medicine, as depicted by the work of Hippocrates, Galen, and their successors and the discipline and innovative ideas of the whole Alexandrian School of thought. He traveled extensively in the Middle East. He came in contact and he was highly influenced by the Arabic medicine, which, at the time,

The Medical Practice and Writings of Paul

Paul of Aegina describes all his knowledge, the basis of his practice, and his experience and innovations in his opus magnum, Epitome of Medicine. This multivolume text comprises 7 books and 519 chapters (Figure 2).3 The first book treats subjects of hygiene, nutrition issues, and patient-specific dietary needs. In the second, the different kinds of fever and conditions related to them are presented as etiologic factors or coexistent conditions like body fluid discharges, critical days, and

Paul on Head Injuries and Disorders

In his work, Paul gives a detailed description of skull fractures and their treatment. He categorizes them as fissure, incisional, expression, depression, arched fracture, and capillary. This categorization has to do with the eventuality that they are linear, with a gap, depression, comminuted, displaced inwards or outwards, and if they are across the hairline. He recognizes the danger that small fractures can cause significant hematoma and contusion with brain injury and consequent death.1, 2

Paul and Spine Surgery

Paul gives a detailed account of the dislocations of the spine. He identifies the severity of such injuries and their high morbidity and mortality rate. In accordance to the Hippocratic and Galenic tradition, he recognizes 3 types of spine dislocations and subluxations: anterior, posterior, and sideways.1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11

In addition, he warns against the violent reduction of such subluxations upon a ladder, just like his predecessors. He attributes the detrimental results of such an action to

Discussion

As far as the work of Paul in the classification, description, and surgical management of skull fractures and head trauma is concerned, one can say that it is heavily based on previous work dating back in ancient Egyptian and Greek medical and surgical concepts; trephinations for the drainage of subdural hematoma, debridement of head fractures, and partial craniotomies were widely used surgical practices of surgery from early antiquity. Trephination is first described in the Edwin Smith

Conclusions

In summary, one can easily identify the surgical talent and boldness of Paul of Aegina compared with the medical and surgical trends of his era. In his work, he uses methods and techniques that would not be used effectively until after the Renaissance in Western Europe. However, our knowledge of his full work is at least incomplete. He established laminectomy and spinal decompression as a sound treatment method for spinal process fractures, and he boldly supported its use as a safe method for

References (13)

  • S. Missios et al.

    Neurosurgery in the Byzantine Empire: the contributions of Paul of Aegina (625-690 AD)

    J Neurosurg

    (2014)
  • K. Markatos et al.

    Paul of Aegina (ca 625-690 AD), his work and his contribution to the treatment of spine disorders: the first routine laminectomy in the recorded history

    Res Hist Med

    (2017)
  • Papadakis M, De Bree E, Trompoukis C, Manios A. Paul of Aegina's surgical Instruments: a complete surgical...
  • Paulus of Aegineta

    Seven Books of Paulus Aegineta

    (1844-1847)
  • U. Er et al.

    Paulus Aegineta: review of spine-related chapters in “Epitomoe Medicoe libri Septem

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2013)
  • M. Ghannaee Arani et al.

    Ibn Sina's (Avicenna) contributions in the treatment of traumatic injuries

    Trauma Mon

    (2012)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • Paulus of Aegina and the Historical Origins of Spine Surgery

    2020, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Paulus was an extensive traveler through the Middle East and was influenced by Islamic medicine, arguably the most advanced in the postclassical era. He returned to Alexandria in the late Byzantine period and remained to continue his works despite the Islamic conquest.36,37 Moreover, his gifted skills in surgery and literacy prowess gained him the reputation as the last of the great Byzantine physicians.

  • An Early Description of Using Oral Route for the Management of Cervical Vertebra Fracture by Ibn al-Quff in the Thirteenth Century

    2018, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, the protective role of spinous process in contusion-type injury that was emphasized by Ibn al-Quff may be an early and advanced view in this field. Other information included in the relevant chapters of Ibn al-Quff's book, such as that regarding pulmonary arrest after atlas injury, a notion introduced by Galen,35,36 and neurologic findings (i.e., paralysis in the upper and lower extremities and urinary and fecal incontinence), examination techniques and prognosis, and management protocols for patients with spinal trauma, were most probably taken from Paul of Aegina's Epitome18-21 and Albucasis' al-Tasrīf.26-28 The main concept of that time, as quoted in Albucasis' work, was as follows: “Treat the patient if the spinal cord is not injured!”

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

View full text