Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 110, February 2018, Pages e321-e329
World Neurosurgery

Original Article
Effects of Low Bone Mineral Status on Biomechanical Characteristics in Idiopathic Scoliotic Spinal Deformity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.177Get rights and content

Background

Low bone mass in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been well reported. Poor bone quality was regarded as a new and unique prognostic factor in aggravating curve progression. However, the potential biomechanical correlation between them remains unclear.

Methods

Three-dimensional finite element models of idiopathic scoliotic spine with different bone mineral status were created for axial loading simulation. An axial load of 3 different body weights was applied on different bone mineral mass models. The mechanical responses of the vertebral cortical and cancellous bone, facet joints, end plate, and intervertebral disc were analyzed.

Results

Accompanied with the low bone mineral status, thoracic scoliosis produced asymmetric and higher stress in the cortical bone, lumbar facet joints, and end plate at the concave side of the thoracic structure curve. Stress increased in the disc at the apex of the scoliosis, whereas it mildly decreased in the L4-5 and L5-S1 disc. Body weight gain increased the stress in scoliotic spine structures in all bone mineral statues.

Conclusions

Biomechanical simulations indicated that low bone mineral mass might aggravate curve progression and induce more serious lumbar compensatory scoliosis in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Weight gain was also a risk factor for curve progression.

Introduction

The cause of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unknown. However, a substantial component of scoliosis progression during the adolescent growth stage is biomechanically mediated.1 The natural physiologic curves of the spine are designed to transfer loads to the pelvis and the lower limbs. Curves act as a cushion for load buffering. Idiopathic scoliotic spine is a complex three-dimensional deformity. A deformed spine has specific biomechanical characteristics.2

The data of our systematic literature review indicated that low bone mineral status was a generalized phenomenon and a systematic disorder in patients with AIS.3 Derangement of bony mechanical stability is quantified by bone quality. Abnormal bone quality and bone matrix mineralization have been detected in patients with AIS.4, 5 Bone quality is an important determinant of bone biomechanics.6 Changes of bone quality in patients with AIS might have distinct influences on mechanical features of deformed anatomic structures. Low bone quality might be associated with many scoliosis parameters.7 Reduction in trabecular bone modulus could substantially increase end-plate and cortical shell stresses.8 The spinal architecture weakened by osteopenia in patients with AIS might aggravate the spinal deformity. Clinical studies have advocated that poor bone quality is a new and unique prognostic factor in curve progression7, 9; the underlying mechanism related to the potential biomechanical correlation between poor bone quality and curve progression is still not so clear.

Finite element analysis has been used for biomechanical comparison between healthy and osteoporotic spine8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and used for biomechanical studies of scoliotic spine.16, 17, 18, 19 In the present study, effects of abnormal bone quality on biomechanical characteristics of the single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis were investigated using our previously reported three-dimensional finite element model.17, 18 The finite element method allows for flexible alteration of material parameters and supports the full field of mechanical results.10, 20 It is suitable for investigating issues related to bone quality.21, 22 Different models of normal, osteopenia, middle-grade osteoporotic AIS spine were developed in the current study. An axial loading simulation was performed. The mechanical responses of the vertebral cortical and cancellous bone, facet joints, end plate, and intervertebral disc were analyzed.

Section snippets

Finite Element Models of an Idiopathic Scoliotic Spine

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of our hospital. The volunteers' parents provided written informed consent for participation. Because Lenke type 1 is the most common curve type of AIS,23 a 14-year-old male patient with idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke type 1 curve was selected in our simulation. This patient had a right-thoracic curve (Cobb, 31°). T8 and T9 were regarded as the apical vertebrae. The curve apex of scoliosis was located at the T8-9 disc. The upper and

Mechanical Response of Vertebral Cortical and Cancellous Bone Structure

Under physiologic axial loading conditions, in both cortical and cancellous bone, high stress was mainly located on the concave side of the thoracic structure curves (Figure 2). The cortical bone structure was the primary bearer of axial compression. The stress value in cortical bone was about more than 3 times that in cancellous bone.

Along with the decrease of bone quality, the stress significantly increased on the concave side of the thoracic structure scoliosis in cortical bone (Figure 2A–D

Discussion

The effects of asymmetric forces acting on a preexisting scoliosis on curve progression are independent of the curve-initiating factors.34 It is not fully elucidated why some children with a small-magnitude scoliosis before the adolescent growth spurt develop a progressive curve. Recently, osteopenia has been regarded as an important risk factor in curve progression. In the present study, we analyzed the influences of different bone quality on biomechanical response in the idiopathic scoliotic

Conclusions

In the current study, we investigated the effect of 3 different bone mineral statuses on biomechanical response in the single thoracic idiopathic scoliotic spine under axial load conditions using the numeric method. The results indicated that a preexisting curve could definitely alter mechanical environment in idiopathic scoliosis structures. The thoracic curve could affect the biomechanical response in the lumbar spine. Higher stress in the scoliotic spine was mainly located at the concave

Acknowledgments

X.F.L. designed the experiments; X.F.L., X.X.S., L.Y.J., B.W.Y., L.Q., H.X.S., and Z.D.L. performed the finite element analysis and analyzed the simulation data. X.F.L. wrote the article.

References (51)

  • R.B. Ashman et al.

    Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material

    J Biomech

    (1988)
  • K. Choi et al.

    The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus

    J Biomech

    (1990)
  • I.A. Stokes

    Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth modulation

    Eur Spine J

    (2007)
  • A.G. Veldhuizen et al.

    The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors

    Eur Spine J

    (2000)
  • X.F. Li et al.

    Low bone mineral status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Eur Spine J

    (2008)
  • T.P. Lam et al.

    Abnormal bone quality in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study on 635 subjects and 269 normal controls with bone densitometry and quantitative ultrasound

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2011)
  • G.Q. Sun et al.

    Abnormal bone matrix mineralization in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Studies in Health Technology & Informatics

    (2012)
  • C.H. Turner

    Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality

    Osteoporos Int

    (2002)
  • W.T. Lee et al.

    Association of osteopenia with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of 919 girls

    Osteoporos Int

    (2005)
  • J. Mizrahi et al.

    Finite-element stress analysis of the normal and osteoporotic lumbar vertebral body

    Spine

    (1993)
  • V.W. Hung et al.

    Osteopenia: a new prognostic factor of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2005)
  • J. Homminga et al.

    Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution

    Spine

    (2001)
  • A. Boccaccio et al.

    Finite element analysis of cancellous bone failure in the vertebral body of healthy and osteoporotic subjects

    Proc Inst Mech Eng H

    (2008)
  • T. Matsumoto et al.

    Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method

    Spine

    (2009)
  • K.G. Faulkner et al.

    Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    Conflict of interest statement: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270027, 30901508) and by Medico-Engineering cooperation Fund of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (numbers YG2012MS25 and YG2016MS54).

    Xiao-Xing Song and Lin-Yu Jin are co-first authors.

    View full text