Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 113, May 2018, Pages 357-365.e1
World Neurosurgery

Literature Review
Efficacy of Posterior Fossa Decompression with Duraplasty for Patients with Chiari Malformation Type I: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.092Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The decrease in syringomyelia was better for patients in the PFDD group than for patients in the PFD group.

  • No significant difference was found in clinical improvement and reoperation rate between the 2 groups.

  • Further studies with a larger data set are required to validate these findings.

Objective

To quantitatively assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD) and posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in treating patients with Chiari malformation type I.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through May 2017. Fourteen cohort studies comprising 3666 patients with Chiari malformation type I were included. Studies were pooled, and the relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

The decrease in syringomyelia was better in patients in the PFDD group than in patients in the PFD group (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.07–2.32, Pheterogeneity = 0.042, I2 = 56.6%). The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR = 5.23, 95% CI = 2.61–10.51, Pheterogeneity = 0.830, I2 = 0%) and aseptic meningitis (RR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.46–11.03, Pheterogeneity = 0.960, I2 = 0%) significantly increased among patients in the PFDD group compared with patients in the PFD group. When stratifying by age, a significantly reduced risk in the reoperation rate was observed in the adult group. However, the clinical improvement and the incidence of wound infection were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the decrease in syringomyelia was better for patients treated with PFDD than for patients treated with PFD alone. However, no significant difference was found in the clinical improvement and the reoperation rate between the 2 groups.

Introduction

Chiari malformation type I (CMI) is a congenital neurologic disorder with sporadic or familial occurrence, in which the cerebellum (or, more specifically, the cerebellar tonsils) descends out of the skull into the spinal area. This results in compression of parts of the brain and spinal cord and disrupts the normal flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Patients with CMI typically present with either brainstem compression or syringomyelia.1, 2 Although many theories have increased our knowledge of Chiari malformation, the exact pathogenesis is unknown.3

The clinical presentation of CMI is thought to be associated with CSF disturbances at the craniovertebral junction or with compression of neural structures. Accordingly, surgical treatment of CMI aims to expand the posterior cranial fossa.4 Although many surgical procedures for Chiari malformation have been used in clinical practice, controversy remains. Two main types of surgical modalities are available for treating CMI. One is posterior fossa decompression (PFD) or posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and the other is reduction of the syrinx cavity using different types of shunt procedures.3, 5 PFD is the primary surgical method for treating CMI because of the low risk of iatrogenic spinal cord injury in shunt procedures.5, 6, 7, 8

Many studies have been published concerning PFDD and PFD as treatment for CMI.1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 However, whether duraplasty should be performed during PFD remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical advantages of the 2 methods for treating CMI.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

The present meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.22

Characteristics of the Studies

As demonstrated in Figure 1, 491 articles were identified, 452 of which were determined to be irrelevant based on the review of titles and abstracts. Thus, 30 full-text articles was assessed for eligibility. Of these 30 articles, 16 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (7 without appropriate comparison and 9 without usable data). Fourteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The 14 retrieved articles comprised 3666 participants, 1631 patients in

Discussion

Meta-analysis is a potentially powerful tool to resolve the discrepancies across individual studies by integrating the results of previous reports.26 In this study, a meta-analysis was performed comparing PFDD and PFD alone in patients with CMI. The meta-analysis showed that the decrease in syringomyelia was better for patients in the PFDD group than for patients in the PFD group (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.07–2.32, Pheterogeneity = 0.042, I2 = 56.6%). The incidence of CSF leak (RR = 5.23, 95%

Conclusions

Despite the limitations of this meta-analysis, it confirmed that the decrease in syringomyelia was better for patients treated with PFDD than for patients treated with PFD alone. However, no significant difference was found in the clinical improvement and the reoperation rate between the 2 groups. Further studies with a larger data set and well-designed models are required to validate the findings.

References (34)

  • J.A. da Silva et al.

    Posterior fossa decompression with tonsillectomy in 104 cases of basilar impression, Chiari malformation and/or syringomyelia

    Arq Neuropsiquiatr

    (2011)
  • N. Di Lorenzo et al.

    “Conservative” cranio-cervical decompression in the treatment of syringomyelia-Chiari I complex. A prospective study of 20 adult cases

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1995)
  • I. Munshi et al.

    Effects of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty on Chiari malformation-associated hydromyelia

    Neurosurgery

    (2000)
  • F.M. Limonadi et al.

    Dura-splitting decompression of the craniocervical junction: reduced operative time, hospital stay, and cost with equivalent early outcome

    J Neurosurg

    (2004)
  • R. Navarro et al.

    Surgical results of posterior fossa decompression for patients with Chiari I malformation

    Childs Nerv Syst

    (2004)
  • D.D. Yeh et al.

    Intraoperative ultrasonography used to determine the extent of surgery necessary during posterior fossa decompression in children with Chiari malformation type I

    J Neurosurg

    (2006)
  • M.J. McGirt et al.

    Intraoperative ultrasonography as a guide to patient selection for duraplasty after suboccipital decompression in children with Chiari malformation type I

    J Neurosurg Pediatr

    (2008)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

      2021, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reoperation risk did not differ among all 3 techniques. Most meta-analyses are in step with that statement.3,9,29 Lin et al.30 postulate the superiority of PFDD over PFD regarding recurrence after initial surgery in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex because duraplasty leads to enlargement of the intradural space.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81102552, 81703978), International Science and Technology cooperation project, Shanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2014081049-4, 201703D421016), Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (Grant No. 2017-129), Returned Chinese Scholars Technology Activities Preferred Project, Shanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2017-19), and Great Science and Technology Innovation Team Project, Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 20150401).

    Zhi Chai and Xiaoming Xue are co–first authors.

    Supplementary digital content available online.

    View full text